DRG-Blog

Distinguishing between tertiary and secondary facilities: a case study of cardiac diagnostic-related groups (DRGs)Distinguishing between tertiary and secondary facilities: a case study of cardiac diagnostic-related groups (DRGs)

30 Juni, 2010 | DRG International, Finanzierung, Kardiologie, Politik, Qualität

Paul Rouse, Ajit Arulambalam, Ralph Correa, Cornelia Ullman:
Distinguishing between tertiary and secondary facilities: a case study of cardiac diagnostic-related groups (DRGs)
N Z Med J. 2010 May 14;123(1314):49-54, New Zealand Medical Association

[NZMEdJ]

« Cost analysis of intubation-related tracheal injury using a national database

Krankenhäuser als Wirtschaftseinheiten – ökonomische Aspekte und Herausforderungen »

Write a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Distinguishing between tertiary and secondary facilities: a case study of cardiac diagnostic-related groups (DRGs)Distinguishing between tertiary and secondary facilities: a case study of cardiac diagnostic-related groups (DRGs)

Write a comment

Schlagwörter

Kategorien

Letzte Artikel

Bookmarklets

Blogroll

Meta