How well does diagnosis-based risk-adjustment work for comparing ambulatory clinical outcomes?
Askar S. Chukmaitov, David W. Harless, Nir Menachemi, Charles Saunders and Robert G. Brooks:
How well does diagnosis-based risk-adjustment work for comparing ambulatory clinical outcomes?
Health Care Management Science, Volume 12, Number 4 / Dezember 2009, P. 420-433, Springer Netherlands
[DOI: 10.1007/s10729-009-9101-3]
Write a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Kategorien
- Ambulante DRGs
- Destatis / Statistik
- DGfM
- DGK
- DIMDI
- DKG
- DRG International
- Fachartikel
- Fachbuch
- Finanzierung
- G-DRG
- HOPE
- ICD
- In Eigener Sache
- InEK
- Kardiologie
- Kodierung
- Kongress
- MDK
- Med. Recht
- NUB
- OPS
- Pflege
- Politik
- Psych-DRG
- Qualität
- Reha
- Termin
- Zeitschriften
- Am J Cardiol.
- Bundesgesundheitsblatt
- Cardiologia.
- Circulation
- Crit Care Med
- Das Gesundheitswesen
- das Krankenhaus
- Der Anaesthesist
- Der Kardiologe
- Deutsches Ärzteblatt
- Eur J Health Eco
- Eur J Public Health
- Fed Regist
- Health Affairs
- Health Care Manag Sci
- Health Economics
- Health Policy
- Health Serv Res
- Healthc Financ Manage
- HIM Journal
- Hospital Topics
- Inquiry
- Int Heart J
- Ital Heart J
- J Ambul Care Manage
- J Law Med Ethics
- JACC
- Journal of Invasive Cardiology
- Journal of Medical Systems
- KU Gesundheitsmanagment
- Lancet
- Med Care
- Med Decis Making
- Medizinische Klinik
- Modern Healthcare
- NEJM
- NHPF
- Quality Management in Healthcare
- Yale J Biol Med
- Z Kardiol
- ZaeFQ
- ZIM
Letzte Artikel
- Krankenkassenfusionen: Größer, stärker, mächtiger
- Money for nothing? – The net costs of medical training
- «Same procedure as every year?»: Kostensteigerung im Gesundheitswesen
Digg it!
del.icio.us